India: Jharkhand Water Project

  • Overview

    In two villages in Jharkhand, India, a World Bank funded water supply project is being forced on local Indigenous Adivasi people in violation of World Bank policy and with disastrous impacts.

    The project began on the land of these Indigenous Santhal and Ho Adivasi communities, who live on the outskirts of Jamshedpur, without provision of even basic information about the project.

    As the project construction began, women and children peacefully protesting the destruction of their sacred sites were beaten and abused, actions for which there has been no accountability.

    The project’s design failed to address impacts on Indigenous cultural resources, customary use of land, social issues, and the environment.

    The project failed to consult with local people through mandatory Gram Sabha (village council) processes protected under Indian law, causing irreparable cultural harm by placing structures on burial, cremation and worship sites of great cultural, historical, and spiritual importance to the Santhal and Ho communities. Communities fear environmental harm if the wastewater from households pollutes their ecosystem.

    Communities also fear this project will contribute to the expansion of Jamshedpur city limits, and take away special self-governance protections they enjoy under Indian law.

    The communities have raised their voices about these concerns through complaints to the World Bank Inspection Panel. After being found eligible, the compliance review investigation process is now underway. Read more about the Inspection Panel here.

    “When construction was attempted for the first time, we strongly protested. At the time, most of the men of the village were away for work. When the women of the village went to the construction site, we were beaten with lathis.” — Member of Giddhijhopri village

  • The Story

    Background: Sacred Spaces on Indigenous Land

    Giddhijhopri is a small village on the outskirts of Jamshedpur city in Jharkhand, India, where a Santhal Indigenous community has lived for generations. The Santhal community follows their traditional Majhi-Pargana system of self-governance. Jaher Sthal, a hill that marks the boundary of the Santhal community village, is the resting place of their ancestors and their sacred grove.

    The Santhals believe that the spirits residing in the Jaher Sthal protect them. For generations, people of Giddhijhopri have buried their dead at the Jaher Sthal, and performed their ritual ceremonies around the sacred grove. Today, an almost complete water treatment plant stands on the summit of the Jaher Sthal.

    Development By Force

    On a July afternoon in 2016, as the women of Giddhijhopri were attending to their household chores and farm work, they heard that police officers along with earthmoving, heavy machinery had arrived at their Jaher Sthal to begin construction work. This was the first time most of these women had heard of the project.  When they protested and asked for legal permission, the police used brute force to disperse the women and filed criminal cases against community members.

    Less than 10 kilometres away, in Sarjamda Purana Basti village, a water storage tank has been built on the memorial site of three brave men who lost their lives in the agitation for an independent state of Jharkhand. Sarjamda Purana Basti is the home of Santhal and Ho Adivasi communities. Ho communities follow a Munda-Manki system of self-governance. Just like people in Giddhijhopri, the villagers in Sarjamda Purana Basti were kept in the dark about the construction of the storage tank on this site of deep historical, cultural significance. Project authorities first came to Sarjamda Purana Basti in 2015, and claimed to be conducting a soil examination. Construction work then began in December 2016 when the village’s traditional leaders were in Delhi despite earlier assurances that no construction would take place without Gram Sabha consent. The Adivasi residents of Sarjamda Purana Basti have passed several Gram Sabha resolutions opposing construction of the tank in their village.

    High Risks and No Rewards

    The Chhotagovindpur and Bagbera multi-village schemes causing harm in the two villages are sub-projects of the Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Project for Low Income States, a US $1 billion project financed by the World Bank (US $500 million) and the Government of India. The project is being implemented in the states of Assam, Bihar, Jharkhand, and Uttar Pradesh in India.

    The communities object to the very premise of the project, which involves charging them for piped water. Presently, the communities have free access to clean water for all purposes, including a pond and under-ground stores accessed through hand-pumps and wells. These piped water schemes risk damaging their current water sources due to the waste they will generate. They understand the project will largely supply water to mainly non-Adivasis living in quasi-urban colonies on the outskirts of Jamshedpur.

    The Complaints

    The two community complaints to the Inspection Panel outline that World Bank’s failure to consult project-affected communities violates not only its own policies, but also Indian law. As an Indigenous-majority area, the villages enjoy special protections under Schedule V of the Constitution of India together with the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996, which requires any development scheme, welfare plan, or decision regarding common community resources be taken by a Gram Sabha (village council) resolution. The complaints underscore that the mandatory Gram Sabha resolutions were not obtained. The communities in Giddhijhopri have stated that the State administration and police authorities also used force to disperse peaceful community protests against the implementation of the Scheme and have filed false criminal cases against members of the village to pressure the community to withdraw their opposition.

    The impact of the water supply schemes on the Santhal and Ho communities risks threatening their unique identity. Communities believe that the water supply schemes are part of the proposed Jamshedpur Urban expansion plan. Once urban expansion happens, they fear these villages will no longer remain rural Adivasi villages and that their traditional governance system and land rights protections will come to an end.

    Responses So Far

    In its written responses to the complaints made by the communities, World Bank management conceded to several safeguard policy non-compliance issues raised in the complaints, including weaknesses in project design and supervision, the conduct and documentation of consultations, disclosure of key scheme-specific documents, and failure to apply the Bank Policy on Cultural Physical Resources.

    On the recommendation of the Inspection Panel, the World Bank Board of Directors approved an investigation into this project on March 1, 2019.

    The Panel has completed their investigation and the communities are in the process of engaging in a consultation on a proposed Management Action Plan, with World Bank Board review of the Inspection Panel’s findings and the Plan expected in Spring 2020.

    Case Partners

    Accountability Counsel’s case partner is Bineet Mundu. Mr. Mundu is an Indigenous academic and social activist, who has many years of experience working with social movements. He is an advisor to the communities.

  • The Case
    • Aug 2019

      On August 27, 2019, both communities filed a Supplement to their original complaints to the Inspection Panel.

    • Mar 2019

      On March 1, 2019, the World Bank Board of Directors approved the Inspection Panel’s recommendation for an investigation into complaints submitted by both Giddhijhopri and Sarjamda Purana Basti villages.

    • Feb 2019

      On February 12, 2019, the Inspection Panel submitted its Report and Recommendation for Inspection for both Giddhijhopri and Sarjamda Purana Basti to the World Bank Board of Directors.

    • Jan 2019

      The Panel received the Management Response to Giddhijhopri’s Request on December 11, 2018, and the Management Response to Sarjamda Purana Basti’s Request on January 28, 2019. As the Inspection Panel notes, “In both Responses, management acknowledged shortcomings in compliance with Bank safeguard policy requirements, including weaknesses in project design and supervision, the conduct and documentation of consultations, disclosure of key scheme-specific documents, a non-objection to the initiation of works ahead of an approved Environmental Management Plan and failure to apply the Bank Policy on Cultural Physical Resources.”

    • Dec 2018

      In December 2018, an Inspection Panel delegation travelled to Jharkhand, viewed the project sites, and met with community members affected by the project.

    • Dec 2018

      On December 12, 2018, the Sarjamda Purana Basti community submitted a Request for Inspection with annexes to the Inspection Panel at the World Bank.

    • Oct 2018

      On October 10, 2018, the Giddhijhopri Majhi, on behalf of the Giddhijhopri community, submitted a comprehensive supplement with annexes to the Request for Inspection.

    • Oct 2018

      On October 8, 2018, the Majhi of Sarjamda Purana Basti sent a letter on behalf of the affected community in Sarjamda Purana Basti to the Team Leader for Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Project for Low Income States at the World Bank.

    • Sep 2018

      On September 20, 2018, the Giddhijhopri community submitted a Request for Inspection to the Inspection Panel at the World Bank.

    • Apr 2018

      On April 6, 2018, the Majhi (traditional leader) of Giddhijhopri sent a letter on behalf of the Giddhijhopri community to the Team Leader for Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Project for Low Income States at the World Bank.

    • May 2017

      On May 18, 2017, the Majhi (traditional leader) of Giddhijhopri wrote to the Department for Drinking Water and Sanitation, Jharkhand, under India’s Right to Information Act, asking for copies of environment and social assessments and environment data sheets pertaining to the Chhotagovindpur and Bagbera multi-village schemes.

    • Jul 2016

      On July 15, 2016, police officers arrived at the Jaher Sthal of Giddhijhopri village accompanied by workers, and earth extraction machines. Women from Giddhijhopri, who gathered at the site, demanded to see the Gram Sabha resolution from Giddhijhopri village, showing consent for the construction work. When the police could not produce any such Gram Sabha resolution, the women peacefully protested against the commencement of project work without proper consultation and community consent.

      In response to this peaceful protest, the police used force, injuring several women and children. The police also filed criminal cases against several leaders of the community.

    • Jan 2014

      The World Bank approved a credit of $500 million for the Rural Water Supply for Low Income States project to improve piped water supply and sanitation schemes in the Indian states of Assam, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, and Jharkhand.

  • Impact

    The Giddhijhopri and Sarjamda Purana Basti communities sought help from Accountability Counsel to develop and pursue complaints to the Inspection Panel through their advisor, Bineet Mundu, in late 2016 and 2017 respectively. With Accountability Counsel’s support, the Santhal and Ho communities filed complaints to the World Bank’s Inspection Panel in 2018 that were successfully registered and found eligible.

    Our work has included continued  support to the communities and their traditional leadership to prepare for, understand, and navigate through each stage of the compliance investigation process, demanding accountability and remedy from the World Bank for its oversight and lack of due diligence that has harmed these communities. This included pre-complaint support to file a Right to Information application with local authorities for project information, facilitating laboratory water testing of water sources, as well as support to draft and file separate complaints with the World Bank Inspection Panel, and a follow-up Supplement to the original complaints.

    In written responses to the complaints from the communities, World Bank Management acknowledged non-compliance on a number of crucial requirements. The World Bank conceded that it did not have the requisite Gram Sabha consent from the two villages. It also agreed that the project implementation was commenced without the mandatory environmental and social assessment. On March 1, 2019, the World Bank Board of Directors approved the Inspection Panel’s recommendation for an investigation into complaints submitted by both Giddhijhopri and Sarjamda Purana Basti villages, moving the complaint forward.

  • Case Media

    Op-Eds

    Media Coverage

    Photos